MarkLayer

Product

MarkLayer featuresWhat's new in MarkLayerPricingSupport the projectAbout MarkLayerPrivacy

Guides

All guidesHow MarkLayer works, in plain EnglishWebsite feedback tools in 2026, twenty-one comparedHow to annotate a website, four waysHow to annotate a PDF for freeHow to annotate an image or screenshotThe best free website annotation tools in 2026, auditedCollecting website feedback without making anyone log inThe Markup.io price hike: what changed and what it costs nowMCP servers for bug reports and visual feedback, comparedGive your AI coding agent visual feedback from a live webpageSending MarkLayer annotations to Jira, Linear, Slack and moreOpen-source website annotation tools in 2026

Use cases

All use casesHow to get client feedback on a staging site without asking them to install anythingPoint an AI coding agent at a UI element on your local dev serverMarkLayer for Design ReviewMarkLayer for QA Bug ReportingMarkLayer for Client FeedbackMarkLayer for Remote TeamsMarkLayer for StudentsMarkLayer for EducatorsMarkLayer for ResearchersMarkLayer for Content CreatorsMarkLayer for MarketersMarkLayer for AgenciesMarkLayer for Freelance Web DesignersMarkLayer for Product Teams

Compare

All comparisonsMarkup.io review: MarkLayer is a free Markup.io alternativePastel vs MarkLayer: a free Pastel alternativeBugHerd vs MarkLayer: a free BugHerd alternativeAnnotateWeb vs MarkLayer: a free AnnotateWeb alternativeJam.dev vs MarkLayer: a free Jam.dev alternativeMarker.io vs MarkLayer: a free Marker.io alternativeUserback vs MarkLayer: a free Userback alternativeRuttl vs MarkLayer: a free Ruttl alternativeLoom vs MarkLayer: a free Loom alternativeHypothesis vs MarkLayer: a free Hypothesis alternativeUsersnap vs MarkLayer: a free Usersnap alternativestagewise vs MarkLayer: a free stagewise alternativeVolley vs MarkLayer: a free Volley alternativeSuperflow vs MarkLayer: a free Superflow alternativeFeedbucket vs MarkLayer: a free Feedbucket alternativeFigma vs MarkLayerHuddlekit vs MarkLayer: a free Huddlekit alternativeAtarim vs MarkLayer: a free Atarim alternativezipBoard vs MarkLayer: a free zipBoard alternativeWebvizio vs MarkLayer: a free Webvizio alternativeBugSmash vs MarkLayer: a free BugSmash alternativeYbug vs MarkLayer: a free Ybug alternativeSureFeedback vs MarkLayer: a free SureFeedback alternativeSimpleCommenter vs MarkLayer: a free SimpleCommenter alternativePageProofer vs MarkLayer: a free PageProofer alternative

Alternatives

All alternativesFree Markup.io alternative: 5 tools comparedFree Pastel alternativesFree AnnotateWeb alternativesFree Jam.dev alternativesThe best free Marker.io alternative, plus 3 more picksFree Userback alternativesFree Hypothesis alternativesBugHerd free alternative: 4 picks, 3 that cost nothingFree Ruttl alternativesFree Usersnap alternativesFree stagewise alternativesFree Loom alternativesThe closest free Huddlekit alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free SureFeedback alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free Atarim alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free Feedbucket alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free PageProofer alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free Superflow alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free Ybug alternative, plus 3 more picksThe closest free SimpleCommenter alternative, plus 3 more picks

Free Pastel alternatives

By Dean Rusin · Last updated: September 2026

MarkLayer is the most direct free Pastel alternative: paste a URL and start annotating the live page, with no account required and no canvas limit to hit. Markup.io, PageProofer and BugHerd are the paid routes, worth it once you need Pastel's project structure or a bug-tracking board instead.

Bottom line

MarkLayer is a fully free, open-source Pastel alternative. Reviewers open one link in any browser and annotate together with live cursors, and nobody installs anything. An optional free account adds a dashboard of your links. Markup.io covers similar ground with no free plan (Pro starts at $79/month); PageProofer and BugHerd are paid too.

On this page

Pastel alternatives compared

OptionPriceBest for
MarkLayerFree. No tiers, no seatsAnyone who needs the core Pastel use case for free.
Markup.ioNo free plan. Pro $79 to $129/month (usage-tiered); Business from $499/month; 14-day trialTeams that want managed project workspaces with unlimited users.
PageProoferNot trackedTeams comfortable on a paid SaaS plan.
BugHerdNo free plan. Standard $50/month (5 members); extra seats $8 eachQA-heavy teams who need a Kanban + integrations.

Prices as published by each vendor, checked August 2026, and read from each tool's owncomparison page. "Not tracked" means there is no comparison page for that option yet, so no price is quoted for it here.

Top free Pastel alternatives

1. MarkLayer

Free and open source: paste a URL and annotate any live webpage in your browser, with live cursors and link-based sharing. No account is required. An optional free login lets you claim your links, set an expiry on each one, and see them all from one dashboard. PDFs and images work too, by link or by uploading a file up to 25MB. A comment can be marked approved, but there are no project folders and no version history of the kind Pastel keeps.

2. Markup.io

Ceros' project-based review platform, structured closer to Pastel's canvas-and-workspace model than the other options here. It never had a one-canvas free tier to outgrow. Pro now starts at $79/month for 50 monthly MarkUps and climbs to $129 for 100, still with unlimited users in one workspace. You stop counting seats and start counting MarkUps. Fits teams that want persistent project history without counting seats.

3. PageProofer

Built for reviewing staging sites before they go live, with the same click-to-comment model as Pastel. There's no permanent free plan, just a 15-day trial. Plans scale by user count: a 5-user Freelancer tier, a 20-user Team tier, then an unlimited-user Agency tier, with extra seats at $5 a month on any of them. PageProofer still doesn't publish the base monthly rate for any tier on its own pricing page.

4. BugHerd

Turns click-to-annotate feedback into tickets on a built-in Kanban board, with native Jira, GitHub, and Trello sync. There's no free plan: Standard runs $50/month for five members, plus $8 for each additional seat. Worth the bill once you need the task-tracking half of the workflow as well as the annotation.

Pastel is built for agencies that need a client to sign off on creative work: a webpage, a PDF, a Figma export. You drop a URL or file into a "canvas", the client clicks and comments on it, and the feedback lives in one thread instead of an email chain three rounds deep in "see attached."

The free plan gives that workflow to one person on one canvas at a time. You can archive a canvas to open another, and archived ones stay readable, but only one is ever active. Start a second client review in the same week and you've hit the ceiling.

That's usually when agencies start pricing Pro ($29 to $35 a month) or Team, which starts at $99 a month for five seats and adds $24 for each seat after that (Pastel's plans page, checked September 2026). A two-person shop reviewing one site at a time might not notice the cap for months. Someone juggling three clients notices it on day one.

The four tools on this page each cover a different slice of what Pastel does. MarkLayer replaces the live-page annotation for free, with no canvas cap and no account required. Markup.io, PageProofer and BugHerd are the paid routes, and each one earns its bill for a different reason.

What switching saves

Two Pastel Pro seats cost $696 a year at the annual rate. Team starts at $1,188 a year for five people, before extra seats. MarkLayer costs nothing for any of those teams, because there is no plan to buy.

The gap grows with headcount. An eight-person team on Pastel Team pays $99 plus three extra seats at $24, which comes to $171 a month or $2,052 a year (same pricing page, same date). On MarkLayer that team still pays zero, and a ninth reviewer changes nothing.

What you give up by leaving Pastel

The canvas. A Pastel canvas is a named project with unlimited versions, filed in project folders, so a client can scroll back to round two of a project that's now on round nine. Pastel's Team plan also connects to Trello, Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Monday and Zapier.

MarkLayer has none of the versioning. Each review is its own link. It can file a comment into Jira, Linear or GitHub, but only one way. If you run the same clients through structured monthly reviews, that is a real loss. If you mostly need someone to look at a page once and say what's wrong, you were paying for a filing cabinet you never opened.

How long the first review takes

On MarkLayer, about as long as pasting a URL. You paste it at marklayer.app, the page loads with the toolbar ready, and you send the link.

Pastel's clients can comment without an account too, so the difference sits on the creator's side: Pastel asks you to sign up and set up a canvas before the first comment. MarkLayer asks nothing of either side. Whoever pasted the URL only needs an account if they later want to manage that link from a dashboard.

AI coding agents on both sides

Both tools now have an MCP server. Pastel's lets Cursor, Claude or ChatGPT read a comment, make the fix, reply and resolve it (usepastel.com/agents, checked September 2026). MarkLayer's marklayer-mcp covers the same loop.

The differences are in what the agent sees and what else it can do. MarkLayer hands the agent each annotation's CSS selector, text fingerprint, computed styles and the React, Vue or Svelte component underneath it. The agent can also watch a room live, mark a comment in progress, dismiss one with a reason, and propose an exact text edit that shows up as a diff. Pastel's page doesn't say which plan includes its agent feature or list its tools in detail, so I can't compare further than that. In both products the final approval belongs to a person. The rest of the feature table is on the MarkLayer vs Pastel comparison.

How long reviews are kept

Pastel keeps a canvas until someone deletes it; its help docs mention no automatic expiry. MarkLayer deletes an unclaimed link 90 days after its last view, comment or edit, and every visit resets that clock. A link you claim with the optional free account stays until you delete it or pick an end date.

So an active review never disappears on MarkLayer. A link nobody has opened for three months does, for good, unless someone claimed it. If you want an archive of past reviews, claim each link. Pastel keeps everything by default, and that is part of what its subscription pays for.

Moving an existing review over

You can't import one. Pastel doesn't export a canvas in any format another tool reads, so the realistic move is to start your next review on MarkLayer and leave the old threads where they are.

It matters less than it sounds, because a MarkLayer review starts from the page URL rather than a project file. If you're mid-round on Pastel, finish that round there. Two tools running side by side for a couple of weeks confuses reviewers less than a half-moved project does.

Who should stay on Pastel

Agencies that put the same clients through recurring review cycles and lean on Pastel's version history, folders or Team-plan integrations. They will feel the missing structure fast.

A freelancer checking one client site a month probably won't miss any of it. A ten-person studio with four client engagements running at once, each client expecting a branded canvas and a status they can check without emailing, almost certainly will. Work out which one you are before switching, because switching back means starting over.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a free version of Pastel?
Yes, but it's built to be outgrown fast: the free plan gives you one user and one active canvas at a time, confirmed on Pastel's own pricing page as of September 2026. You can archive a canvas to open a new one, but only one stays live. Pro runs $29 to $35 a month; Team starts at $99 a month for five users plus $24 per extra seat. MarkLayer skips all of that. It's free, with no canvas limit and no seat count, plus an optional account if you want a dashboard of your own links.
What's the best free option instead of Pastel?
MarkLayer for the core visual-feedback use case. Markup.io if you're comfortable paying for the same kind of project-workspace structure Pastel offers. BugHerd if you need full bug-tracking workflow on top of the annotation.
Can I self-host something instead of Pastel?
MarkLayer is open source and self-hostable on Cloudflare Workers, so you can run it on infrastructure you control. Pastel, Markup.io, PageProofer, and BugHerd are all closed-source SaaS with no self-hosting option.
What does MarkLayer not do that Pastel does?
Versioning and filing. Pastel keeps unlimited versions of each canvas, groups reviews in project folders and includes a formal Approvals step on every plan, Free included (Pastel's plans page, checked September 2026). MarkLayer's optional account gives you a list of your links and a comment can be marked approved, but nothing is versioned.
Does Pastel work with AI coding agents the way MarkLayer does?
Yes. As of September 2026 Pastel offers an MCP server that lets Cursor, Claude or ChatGPT read a comment, make the fix, reply and resolve it. MarkLayer's marklayer-mcp covers the same loop and also lets an agent watch a room live and propose exact text edits as diffs.

Try MarkLayer

Paste any URL at marklayer.app and annotate the live page in your browser. No install, no account, no sign-up. Recipients of your share links don't need to install anything either.

Annotate a page

Or add the free Chrome extension for sites the web app cannot embed, such as pages behind a login.